MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Juan Pablo Ficovich [157th] vs Patrick Zahraj [276th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Ficovich 0 - 0 Zahraj

Ficovich vs Zahraj H2H Profile
Ficovich Stats Zahraj
62% (21-13) YTD Win/Loss 61% (19-12)
0 Head-to-Head 0
157 Ranking 276
125 Highest Rank 272
28 Age 25
R Plays -
13 Titles 0
57% (399-303) Career Total W/L 58% (131-94)
$322,630 Career Prize Money $3,650
0 YTD Titles 0
0 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Ficovich VS Zahraj H2H Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Patrick Zahraj Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ficovich 0 - 0 Zahraj

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ficovich has won 45.95% of points on their second serve, while Zahraj has won 42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ficovich, in recent form, has won 44.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zahraj has won 50.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.77% and 28.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ficovich has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zahraj has saved 53.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ficovich has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 50/ 35), with Zahraj winning 58.82% (W/L 50/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 347/ 234), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 41/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.56% of matches (W/L 43/ 28), where as Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ficovich has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.81 while Zahraj has played against players with an average rank of 398.28.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ficovich has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zahraj has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ficovich has converted 32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zahraj has converted 34.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Miguel Tobon
    50% ( 14 of 28)
    1st Serve %
    47% ( 25 of 53)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    6
    93% ( 13 of 14)
    1st Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    79% ( 11 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 12 of 28)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    14% ( 4 of 28)
    Rtn Points Won
    60% ( 32 of 53)
    56
    Total Points Won
    25
    W
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Roberto Cid Subervi
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 62)
    3
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    94% ( 30 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 22 of 35)
    69% ( 11 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    59% ( 16 of 27)
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    15% ( 7 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    65
    Total Points Won
    45
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Maxime Janvier
    56% ( 50 of 90)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 50 of 91)
    5
    Aces
    2
    4
    Double Faults
    11
    78% ( 39 of 50)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 38 of 50)
    43% ( 17 of 40)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 12 of 41)
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    38% ( 34 of 90)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 41 of 91)
    97
    Total Points Won
    84
    W
    6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alfredo Perez
    Player
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    63% ( 50 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 56 of 87)
    6
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    74% ( 37 of 50)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 35 of 56)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    34% ( 27 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 35 of 87)
    87
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dmitry Popko
    Player
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    59% ( 20 of 34)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 19 of 42)
    5
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    90% ( 18 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    71% ( 10 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    22% ( 5 of 23)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    18% ( 6 of 34)
    Rtn Points Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    52
    Total Points Won
    24
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Rodrigo Alujas
    56% ( 35 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 57 of 84)
    4
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    69% ( 24 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 29 of 57)
    50% ( 14 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 13 of 27)
    26% ( 5 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    40% ( 25 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 42 of 84)
    80
    Total Points Won
    67
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Juan Alejandro Hernandez
    61% ( 31 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 43 of 63)
    10
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    90% ( 28 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 26 of 43)
    60% ( 12 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    22% ( 11 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 28 of 63)
    68
    Total Points Won
    46
    W
    6-1 7-6(4) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Juan Alejandro Hernandez
    Player
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    63% ( 45 of 72)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 37 of 82)
    2
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    71% ( 32 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 26 of 37)
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 17 of 45)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    13% ( 1 of 8)
    36% ( 26 of 72)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 39 of 82)
    85
    Total Points Won
    69
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    Player
    Zachary Svajda
    62% ( 40 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    42% ( 29 of 69)
    6
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    75% ( 30 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    79% ( 23 of 29)
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 17 of 40)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 6)
    34% ( 22 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 29 of 69)
    72
    Total Points Won
    62
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    F
    cross
    Felipe Meligeni Alves
    Player
    Juan Pablo Ficovich
    73% ( 47 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 51 of 83)
    4
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    68% ( 32 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 27 of 51)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 18 of 32)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    34% ( 22 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 38 of 83)
    80
    Total Points Won
    67
    L
    6-2 1-6 6-2 H2H

    Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Miguel Tobon
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    55% ( 42 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 32 of 62)
    1
    Aces
    4
    6
    Double Faults
    9
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    72% ( 23 of 32)
    44% ( 15 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 11 of 30)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    43% ( 33 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 28 of 62)
    71
    Total Points Won
    67
    L
    4-6 6-3 2-0 ret. H2H
    R1
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
    56% ( 34 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 39 of 58)
    2
    Aces
    0
    7
    Double Faults
    4
    74% ( 25 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    37% ( 10 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 7 of 19)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    22% ( 2 of 9)
    43% ( 26 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 34 of 58)
    69
    Total Points Won
    50
    W
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Marc-Andrea Huesler
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    59% ( 38 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    40% ( 26 of 65)
    6
    Aces
    7
    4
    Double Faults
    7
    82% ( 31 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    77% ( 20 of 26)
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 19 of 39)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 20 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 26 of 65)
    70
    Total Points Won
    59
    L
    7-6(6) 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mitchell Krueger
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    67% ( 52 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 32 of 62)
    5
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    4
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    46% ( 12 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    45% ( 35 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 29 of 62)
    72
    Total Points Won
    68
    L
    6-7(5) 5-3 ret. H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Felix Corwin
    65% ( 51 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 30 of 59)
    3
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    67% ( 34 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    41% ( 11 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    42% ( 33 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 26 of 59)
    71
    Total Points Won
    66
    W
    6-4 7-5 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Jelle Sels
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    73% ( 74 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 59 of 90)
    8
    Aces
    13
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    73% ( 54 of 74)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 43 of 59)
    37% ( 10 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 11 of 31)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    37% ( 37 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 36 of 90)
    100
    Total Points Won
    91
    L
    6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Arthur Fery
    68% ( 47 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    74% ( 45 of 61)
    8
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    68% ( 32 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 28 of 45)
    59% ( 13 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 6 of 16)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    35% ( 24 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    72
    Total Points Won
    58
    W
    7-5 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Mae Malige
    63% ( 69 of 110)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 51 of 85)
    7
    Aces
    4
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    65% ( 45 of 69)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    41% ( 17 of 41)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 15 of 34)
    67% ( 6 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    44% ( 48 of 110)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 38 of 85)
    100
    Total Points Won
    95
    W
    4-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Alexey Vatutin
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    5
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    81% ( 25 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    61% ( 11 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    27% ( 13 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 24 of 49)
    60
    Total Points Won
    38
    W
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Tom Gentzsch
    Player
    Patrick Zahraj
    73% ( 38 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    5
    Aces
    5
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    82% ( 31 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    25% ( 13 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 25 of 53)
    64
    Total Points Won
    41
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Ficovich & Zahraj Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Juan Pablo Ficovich Ficovich Stats Patrick Zahraj Zahraj
    57% (399/303) Win/Loss 58% (131/94)
    56% (903/724) Sets Win/Loss 57% (290/218)
    52% (8039/7379) Games Win/Loss 53% (2550/2268)
    0.27 Aces Per Game 0.32
    2046 Aces Total 754
    0.16 Double Faults Per Game 0.36
    1225 Total Double Faults 853
    1:28:50 Average Match Time 1:27:9
    448.77 Average Opponent Rank 370.6
    62% (25771/41818) 1st Serve % 62% (7652/12343)
    68% (17518/25771) 1st Serve Win % 68% (5226/7652)
    51% (8176/16047) 2nd Serve Win % 45% (2090/4691)
    41% (1833/4420) Break Points Won % (Total) 43% (603/1397)
    41% (17324/42677) Return Points Win % 42% (5347/12594)
    57% (393/695) Best of 3 Sets Win % 59% (130/220)
    100% (2/2) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
    48% (98/206) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 55% (32/58)
    52% (117/227) Deciding Set Win % 54% (33/61)
    84% (396/334) 1st Set Won, Won Match 86% (130/112)
    16% (396/62) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 13% (130/17)
    20% (305/62) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 20% (95/19)

    Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juan Pablo Ficovich

    San Luis Potosi Challenger

    Martin vs Ficovich H2H, could play in The Final

    Duckworth vs Ficovich H2H, could play in The Final

    View full predicted draw for Ficovich

    Other Predictions

    • Loading news...